Two-Stage Revision Surgery for Infected Hip and Knee Replacements

The gold standard surgical treatment for established periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip and knee. Mr Hussain performs two-stage revision at the Royal Orthopaedic Hospital Birmingham, working closely with specialist microbiology and infectious disease teams.

🏆
5,000+
Total procedures
Doctify 4.98/5
498 verified reviews
🎓
Fellowship Trained
ENDO-Klinik Hamburg

Understanding Infection

What Is Periprosthetic Joint Infection?

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a bacterial infection that develops around a hip or knee replacement implant. It is one of the most serious complications of joint replacement surgery, but it is treatable with the right specialist care and a structured surgical and antibiotic strategy.

PJI can present at different times after surgery and in different ways:

  • Early infection (within 4 to 6 weeks of surgery): typically presents with wound redness, discharge, swelling and fever. Often caused by skin organisms such as Staphylococcus aureus introduced at the time of surgery.
  • Delayed infection (6 weeks to 2 years post-surgery): may present more subtly with progressive pain. Often caused by less virulent organisms such as coagulase-negative staphylococci or Propionibacterium, which form a slow-growing biofilm on the implant surface.
  • Late haematogenous infection (over 2 years post-surgery): typically arises from a distant bacterial source such as a urinary tract infection, chest infection, or dental procedure. May present acutely with pain, swelling and fever in a previously well-functioning joint.

If you notice pain, swelling, warmth, wound discharge, or fever around a joint replacement, seek urgent specialist assessment. Blood tests (CRP, ESR, white cell count) and joint aspiration with microbiology culture are used to confirm the diagnosis and guide antibiotic selection.

Surgical Treatment

The Two-Stage Surgical Process

Two-stage revision surgery separates the infection management and reconstruction phases into two distinct operations, maximising the chance of permanent infection eradication before committing to a new permanent implant.

Stage 1

Removal, Debridement and Spacer Insertion

The first stage is a full explantation of all implant components, including any cement that may be present. There is no selective component retention: every piece of metal, polyethylene, and cement is removed to eliminate the biofilm-coated surfaces that harbour bacteria and resist antibiotic penetration.

Following explantation, the joint is thoroughly debrided. All infected, necrotic, and devitalised tissue is excised. Synovial membrane, granulation tissue, and any sinus tract are also removed. Multiple tissue samples are sent to microbiology for culture and sensitivity to identify the causative organism and direct antibiotic therapy.

An antibiotic-loaded cement spacer is then inserted. The spacer serves two purposes: it maintains the space between the bones to prevent shortening and soft tissue contracture, and it delivers high local concentrations of antibiotic directly to the site of infection, concentrations that systemic antibiotics alone cannot achieve. The spacer can be articulating (allowing some movement between stages) or static, depending on clinical circumstances.

After surgery, the patient receives a course of intravenous antibiotics, transitioning to oral antibiotics guided by the microbiology results, typically for 6 to 12 weeks. Inflammatory markers (CRP and ESR) are monitored regularly throughout this period.

Stage 2

Reimplantation of New Permanent Implants

Stage 2 is performed once there is high confidence that the infection has been eradicated. This is determined by clinical assessment (no signs of ongoing infection), normalisation of CRP and ESR, and, where appropriate, joint aspiration with culture in the week before reimplantation. A positive aspiration result delays Stage 2 until the infection is fully controlled.

At Stage 2, the spacer is removed, the joint is again thoroughly debrided and lavaged, and new permanent implant components are inserted. Because infection and the spacer period both cause additional bone loss, Stage 2 reconstruction is often more complex than the original primary surgery would have been. Long stems, augments, bone grafting, and dual mobility cups may all be required.

Intraoperative tissue samples are again sent for culture to confirm infection eradication. A period of post-operative antibiotics is typically prescribed, guided by the infectious disease or microbiology team.

  • Infection eradication confirmed before Stage 2 proceeds
  • Full spectrum of revision implants available for complex bone loss reconstruction
  • Published success rates of 85 to 92% for long-term infection control
  • Close multidisciplinary collaboration with microbiology and infectious disease

Choosing the Right Approach

Two-Stage Revision vs DAIR: Which Is Right?

The choice between two-stage revision and DAIR (Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention) depends primarily on the duration of infection, the condition of the implant, the causative organism, and the presence or absence of a sinus tract. Both approaches have a role in the management of periprosthetic joint infection, and the decision is made on an individual case basis.

Two-Stage Revision: Established or Chronic Infection

Two-stage revision is the preferred treatment when:

  • Infection has been present for more than 4 to 6 weeks
  • A sinus tract (discharging wound) is present
  • The causative organism is resistant or difficult to treat with antibiotics
  • The implant is loose or structurally compromised
  • Significant soft tissue damage or necrosis is present

DAIR: Early or Acute Infection with Implant Retention

DAIR is considered when:

  • Infection is within 4 to 6 weeks of primary surgery
  • Or: acute haematogenous infection with symptoms for less than 3 weeks in a well-functioning joint
  • The implant is well fixed and structurally sound
  • There is no sinus tract
  • The organism is sensitive to antibiotics that can penetrate biofilm

Revision Surgery in Birmingham

Why Choose Mr Hussain for Revision Surgery?

Mr Hussain holds a subspecialty fellowship from ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, one of the world's leading centres for revision arthroplasty, and has contributed 33 peer-reviewed publications to the orthopaedic literature. His practice at the Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Priory Hospital Edgbaston, and Harborne Hospital is built on a foundation of 5,000+ procedures and a Doctify rating of 4.98 from 498 verified reviews.

5,000+
Total procedures
4.98
Doctify verified rating
33
Peer-reviewed publications

Patient Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

What is two-stage revision surgery?+
Two-stage revision surgery is a two-part operation for treating established periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) around a hip or knee replacement. In Stage 1, all infected implant components are removed, the joint is thoroughly debrided, and an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer is inserted to maintain joint space and deliver local antibiotics. After a course of systemic antibiotics and confirmation that the infection has been eradicated, Stage 2 reimplants new permanent components.
When is two-stage revision preferred over DAIR?+
Two-stage revision is preferred for established or chronic PJI (infection present for more than 4 to 6 weeks), when a sinus tract is present, when the causative organism is resistant or difficult to treat, or when the implant is loose. DAIR is reserved for early or acute infection with a well-fixed implant and a sensitive organism, when the infection duration is short enough that biofilm has not fully matured on the implant surface.
How long is the interval between the two stages?+
The interval between Stage 1 and Stage 2 is typically 6 to 12 weeks, during which the patient receives targeted antibiotics guided by microbiology results. Before Stage 2, infection eradication is confirmed by normalisation of inflammatory markers (CRP and ESR) and, where appropriate, joint aspiration with culture. The interval may be extended if there is any ongoing concern about infection control.
What is the success rate of two-stage revision?+
Two-stage revision surgery has reported infection eradication rates of approximately 85 to 92% in published series, making it the most reliable surgical treatment for established PJI. Success depends on complete debridement, appropriate antibiotic selection guided by microbiology, patient host factors (immune status, comorbidities), and the virulence of the organism. Outcomes are best at high-volume specialist centres with dedicated infection MDT support.

Ready to Discuss Your Revision Surgery?

Book a private consultation with Mr Hussain at the Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Priory Hospital Edgbaston, or Harborne Hospital.